Senate Blocks Permanent Daylight Saving Bill
Lawmakers cite late winter sunrises as the primary obstacle to a House-passed measure that President Trump has aggressively championed on social media.
By Rafael Collins ·

Senate leadership has signaled it will not move a House-passed bill to make daylight saving time permanent before the end of the year. The decision stands in direct contradiction to the recent, forceful demands of President Donald Trump. Americans across the country will turn their clocks back an hour early Sunday, continuing a twice-yearly practice that many find frustrating.
The legislative standoff centers on a simple geographic concern: where the sun rises. Several senators, particularly those representing northern states, argue that permanent daylight saving time would push winter sunrises too late. They fear the change would require children to travel to school in the dark. This specific worry has united a group of otherwise diverse senators against the measure.
Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas has become the most visible voice of opposition. As a member of the Republican leadership, his resistance carries weight. Cotton noted that Congress has attempted to make daylight saving time permanent in the past and reverted the policy after the public complained about late sunrises. He stated that no one likes changing the clock, but the historical data suggests the current system is less problematic than a permanent switch.
President Trump has intensified his pressure on his own party members to pass the bill. Earlier this month, the president posted his personal cellphone number on social media and instructed Cotton to get the job done. He argued that afternoon sunshine is superior to morning light and claimed that criminals prefer working in the dark. Trump renewed his call for action this week, writing that the Senate was letting the bill die despite majority support in the country.
The president has also framed the issue through the lens of personal habit and safety. As an avid golfer, he has suggested that permanent daylight saving time would provide more hours for his favorite sport. He further argued that the time change is dangerous when workers must adjust steeples on churches and municipal buildings. He criticized the modern habit of relying on digital clocks that adjust automatically, stating that no one wants to spend their time manually turning clocks back twice a year.
Despite these efforts, the vote count in the Senate appears unchanged. Senator Todd Young of Indiana described the House bill as a non-starter for Republican leaders. Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio was even more direct, responding to questions about the bill's prospects with a simple "No way." Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the Majority Leader, has not publicly weighed in on the specific House bill, though he has voted against similar versions in the past.
The current debate echoes a historical precedent from 1973. During an energy crisis, Congress enacted permanent daylight saving time as a trial. By October of that year, public support had dropped sharply, largely due to concerns about children walking to school in the dark. The law was repealed, and the standard twice-yearly clock change was restored.
Public opinion remains mixed on the best alternative. An AP-NORC poll last year found that only 12 percent of American adults supported keeping the current system. Nearly half opposed it. Senator Rick Scott of Florida, who signed legislation in 2018 to keep his state on daylight saving time year-round, has led recent efforts to change federal law. He cited constant feedback from Americans who are tired of the clock change.
Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts has also voiced support for ending the practice. He described the ritual of shifting time as having a real impact on the economy, health, and happiness. He called for an end to 4 p.m. winter sunsets. The Senate will return to Washington after the November 3 midterm election, but few expect a vote on the time change bill in the short window that remains.





