Trump Team Seeks Emergency Halt on 20,000 California Mail-In Ballots
The Justice Department argues that ballots from suspected non-citizens must be separated before the Nov. 3 vote to protect election integrity.
By Jonathan Ramirez ·

Approximately 20,000 mail-in ballots in California are at the center of an emergency legal battle that reached the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. The Trump administration filed an appeal seeking to pause the counting of these specific votes until federal officials can verify the citizenship status of the voters. This move follows a decision by a federal appeals court to deny the government's earlier request to set aside the ballots.
The dispute began when the Department of Justice identified a list of registered voters it suspected were not U.S. citizens. The federal government contends that these ballots should not be included in the final tally until their status is confirmed. California state officials counter that the federal list is unreliable and likely contains many individuals who are, in fact, citizens. A district court judge had previously rejected the Justice Department's request, warning that removing the ballots could deprive eligible citizens of their right to vote in the upcoming midterms.
In its petition to the Supreme Court, the Justice Department is asking for a limited stay of enforcement. The agency wants California to stop mixing the disputed ballots with the rest of the mail-in votes while the case proceeds. The administration has prioritized identifying non-citizen voters this year, a demographic that officials acknowledge is rare but legally distinct. The case arrives at the high court as the state prepares for a general election on November 3 that will determine control of Congress.
California has been conducting its election via mail since early October. The state has roughly 23 million registered voters, and hundreds of thousands of ballots have already been processed. Lower courts have sided with state officials in this instance, with one district judge noting that separating the ballots would cause significant disruption to the election process. Judge David O. Carter, a federal district judge nominated by President Bill Clinton, wrote that if the executive branch can dismiss votes based on unproven accusations, the democracy is in peril.
The Justice Department has sought to accelerate the legal proceedings, previously asking an appeals court to intervene early without success. The Trump administration has secured several recent emergency appeals victories at the Supreme Court. However, the justices had previously blocked the president from restricting mail-in ballots before the election. The Supreme Court has not yet indicated when it will rule on the emergency request.





